Get started
iShares Russell 2000 ETFiShares Russell 2000 ETFiShares Russell 2000 ETF

iShares Russell 2000 ETF

No trades
See on Supercharts
Overview Analysis News
Ideas
Discussions Technicals Seasonals Options

IWM trade ideas

Opening (IRA): IWM December 29th 155 Short Put... for a 1.56 credit. Comments: Rounding out rungs in the last of the available expiries in the 4th quarter, targeting the <16 delta strike paying around 1% of the strike price in credit to emulate dollar cost averaging into the broad market using short puts. If I had nothing on in IWM, I'd probably go shorter duration (e.g., November 17th) where the 165 is paying 1.75 at the moment; I already have a rung at that strike, so am going out farther in duration to keep theta on and burning. The same would probably go for my Friday stuff in the Q's and in SPY.
AMEX:IWM
by NaughtyPines
IWM looking vulnerableThe Russel 2000 closed below the daily 200 MA today. It's never a good sign for the breadth in the market when the Russel starts breaking down. I think there's a strong likelhood we continue to breakdown, based off todays IWM price action. Small caps got rejected today at the pre market high and just kept selling all day. What makes thing price action bad is the fact that we closed below the pre market low and the daily 200 MA. The volume on todays close was higher than usual which also indicates some serious selling pressure. A clear Head & shoulders pattern is apparent on the chart, if this triggers...watch out below.
AMEX:IWMShort
by Trading-Capital
IWM - Ascending Triangle PatternIWM has been flip-flopping within an Ascending Triangle Pattern for the past 1 year+. It is no wonder that many of the smaller stocks are exhibiting wild flip-flops in the past months. On a more optimistic note, an ascending triangle pattern has greater odds of breaking to the upside eventually. For IWM, this means a breakup above 198-199 could happen eventually (not guaranteed but good odds). Until this happens, we might continue to see a very mixed/weak market especially for the smaller-cap stocks. Meanwhile stock picking skills with good money management is tantamont to traverse this market If and when a breakup happens in IWM, it is likely the market bulls will be back in force. Meanwhile, can only wait and see what happens. Disclaimer: TA is about improving our odds of a successful trade (not a guarantee). This is just my own analysis and opinion for discussion and is NOT a trade advice. Kindly do your own due diligence and trade according to your own risk tolerance and don't forget that money management is (probably the most) important! Take care and Good Luck!
AMEX:IWM
by Juliac
The Day Ahead: Premium Selling in IWM, QQQ, FXI, GDXJ, SMHIt's Fryyyydayyyy ... (which is when I tend to do all my "stuff"). Well, unless you've been hiding under a rock (no judgment here), you'll know that premium-selling in broad market isn't very good here, with IWM IVR/IV at 12.3/19.7%, QQQ at 9.1/20.1%, and SPY at 6.8/14.4%. That sub-25 IVR is telling you that broad market IV is in the bottom quarter of its 52-week range which for premium-sellers is kind of drag. Your premium-selling options in this environment (at least from a premium selling perspective) are to (a) do nothing; (b) sell your go-to delta and duration for whatever the market is paying, knowing that you might get assigned at the strike or have a poo pile to manage toward expiry; or (c) go longer-dated to get paid something decent with the probability of profit (POP) and or probability of touch (POT) that you're used to. Since I'm trying to create cash flow here (at least in the retirement account), I generally opt for (c), since I'm not fond of cleaning up poo piles with a great deal of frequency and like high POP/low POT. With that goal in mind, I generally target the shortest duration <16 delta strike that is paying around 1% of the strike price in credit. Currently, the shortest duration <16 delta strike paying that in IWM is the December 15th 164 (14 delta, bid 1.65); in QQQ, the December 15th 325 (14 delta, bid 3.26); and in SPY, the Jan 19th 400 (16 delta, bid 4.24), so I'll look to add short put rungs in those durations or greater. Because broad market sucks so hard though, I'll also be venturing out into the exchange-traded fund space to see if I can scrounge up any premium there. Currently, FXI (IVR 11.3/30.8%), GDXJ (7.6/30.3%), and SMH (17.6/28.7%) are at the top of my screener when sorted for 30-day IV, but you can see that IV is also at the low end of the 52 week range in that space, too. The ideal is to sell in both high IVR/high IV with IVR >50/IV>35% for ETF's, but there is nothing currently in the space with those metrics, so -- as with broad market -- you're options are the same: (a) do nothing; (b) sell your go-to delta/duration with the chips falling where they may; or (c) sell longer duration with your go-to POP/POT. Here are the shortest duration <16 strikes paying around 1% of strike price in credit for these underlyings: FXI, Dec 15th 22.85, 13 delta, bid .29 (don't know what the odd ball strike is about). GDXJ, Nov 17th 29, 12 delta, bid .31. SMH, Nov 17th 130, 13 delta, bid 1.35. I would note that there is a highly options-liquid ETF with >50% IV, and it's TQQQ, with an IVR of 17.3 and a 30-day IV of (wait for it) ... 70.5%. It's a leveraged instrument, so I would exercise caution trading it with the expectation that, for example, the 16 delta (the 2 times expected move strike in non-leveraged stuff) is a "safe" strike to sell with limited assignment risk, a high probability of expiring worthless, and/or not being an in-the-money headache toward expiry. As long as you're familiar with all these "warts," it's probably okay to play small. That being said, it won't be particularly buying power efficient on margin; it looks like my broker's requiring that it be cash secured (most underlyings require 20% of the strike price or thereabouts in buying power), so the buying power requirement makes it "less sexy" in spite of its high IV. Lastly, I would be neglectful were I to not mention the single name space for premium-selling here, but my general order of preference in selling premium (particularly in the retirement account) is (a) broad market; (b) exchange-traded funds; and (c) single name (in that order). Here are the top 30-day IV, highly options liquid single name underlyings at the moment that are trading at >$20/share and with a 30-day>50%. There isn't a ton here and (as with everything else), IV is at the low end of its 52-week range (I mean 1.0? c'monnnn, you're killing me here, smalls): AFRM (Tech/Software)), IVR/IV 1.0/75.5% RIVN (Automaker/EV), 5.5/65.5% TSLA (Automaker/EV), 11.3/52.7%
AMEX:IWM
by NaughtyPines
Opening (IRA): IWM Jan 19th 157 Short Put... for a 1.58 credit. Comments: Targeting the <16 delta strike paying around 1% of the strike price in credit to emulate dollar cost averaging into the broad market. As I mentioned in my earlier post (See Below), shorter duration is probably paying, but I already have rungs on in the Nov 17th, Dec 15th, and Dec 29th expiries, so going out to 2024 here. Naturally, I'll sell in shorter duration if I can get in at strikes better than what I currently have on.
AMEX:IWMLong
by NaughtyPines
Russell 2000 is CHEAP relative to S&P500AMEX:IWM long vs AMEX:SPY short -------------------------- This is a "spread trade" between two indexes which is sometimes called a "pairs trade". Typically a "pairs trade" is between two similar stocks in a similar industry whose fortunes are tied together to a similar end user or buyer. Imagine NYSE:KO and NASDAQ:PEP (Coca-Cola vs Pepsi) as a decent example. The typical "pairs trade" swings back and forth on expectations from different economic environments. The Russell 2000 ( AMEX:IWM and CME_MINI:RTYM2023 ) can be influenced by perceptions of interest rates and projections of economic activity. The rationale is that smaller companies like those in the Russell have higher dependency on borrowed money and will be hurt more in an economic contraction. They don't have the international reach and have more risk to the domestic economy and have lower borrowing capacity, which makes them overall more risky. This isn't necessarily true, but it is the way the market views this trade and what gives it the potential to generate returns. What this ratio tells me here is that expectations are very low for Russell 2000 companies and very high for S&P500 companies and that there may be risk to that assumption. Therefore, we should research into the actual facts and see if that is true. The fact is that here at current levels the Russell2000 has lagged the S&P500 Index by 30% from the high in 2021 but in order for this ratio to move back to the levels of 2017-2018-2021, it would need to advance by over 45%. How much do we risk in this trade here? The average "monthly" range in this ratio is about 4%, so we can risk about 4%-5% and admit we are wrong if the ratio slides under 0.41 (the bottom of the green box). The upside? Let's see how it moves, but the goal initially would be a gain of 3x the average monthly range or 12%-15%. Tim 11:11AM EST 5/1/2023
AMEX:IWMLong
by timwest
16
IWM - the small caps get smallerBearish pennant "may be" done here. Above 203 on IWM and the idea is probably INVALID. I've pointed out the SPY/IWM monthly bull flag before (idea is linked below). If correct, it shows IWM losing considerably to the rest of the market. Why? Well I'm still wary of the Banks even though it's been a minute since anyone has really thought they are a problem. Interesting as KRE still looks completely bearish. I believe IWM will lead the correction with Tech staying stronger for a short while. IWM bear pennant is hinting at a larger correction for the market, however if it's an ABC it would also be a wonderful buying opportunity when it's finished. Good luck!
AMEX:IWMShort
by the_sunship
10
Russell is dancing on the clif"The Russell 2000 index (IWM) is currently displaying a weak and bearish pattern. After a significant downward move, IWM formed a substantial symmetrical triangle, which is typically considered a bearish pattern, often referred to as a bearish pennant. Around mid-July, the index broke out to the upside from this symmetrical triangle, marked with a circle. At that point, it seemed that the Russell was poised for an upward trend. However, a lesser-known pattern known as the 'death hook' emerged. The death hook, or fake breakout, is a potent trend reversal pattern that tends to occur during situations of fake breakouts or breakdowns. It appears that this pattern has manifested in the case of the Russell. This suggests that the breakout was deceptive, enticing smaller market participants to enter the market before reversing course and moving sharply downward. While a minor bounce may occur, it's expected to be short-lived. In all likelihood, the price will eventually break down from this bearish pattern and continue its descent. The only potential scenario for the bulls to regain control is if they intervene decisively, triggering another breakout to the upside accompanied by strong trading volume."
AMEX:IWMShort
by Consistent_Trades
$IWM Bullish Daily Close AMEX:IWM Small Caps had a Bullish Daily Close. Tested my support level. Small caps will lead the broader market. The IWM is more sensitive to liquidity. I have been long since the blue arrow. A "double bottom" is a bullish reversal pattern that occurs after a downtrend and is characterized by two consecutive lows at a similar price level, followed by a breakout above the pattern's neckline. This pattern suggests a potential reversal from the downtrend to an uptrend. A "false breakdown" occurs when a price breaks below a support level but quickly reverses and closes back above it. This can be interpreted as a bullish sign, indicating that the selling pressure wasn't sustained, and buyers stepped in to push the price back up. The idea that "the best moves come from failed moves" is a common adage in trading and investing. It suggests that when a market or a security initially breaks out or breaks down and then reverses, it can lead to strong price movements in the opposite direction. This is often attributed to the idea that traders who were positioned on the wrong side of the initial move are forced to close their positions, contributing to the momentum in the opposite direction. It's important to note that while these concepts are commonly discussed in trading circles, they are not foolproof strategies. Technical analysis is just one approach to understanding price movements in financial markets, and it should be used in conjunction with other forms of analysis and risk management strategies. Markets can be unpredictable, and there is no guarantee that any pattern or signal will always lead to a profitable outcome.
AMEX:IWMLong
by AlgoTradeAlert
2
IWM - Rising Trend Channel [MID-TERM]🔹Rising trend breaking downwards in medium long term. 🔹Between support 170 and resistance 199 in Rectangle Formation. 🔹Broken through support at 188, indicating a falling direction and predicting further decline. 🔹RSI curve indicates a potential early indication of a falling trend in the price. 🔹Technically NEGATIVE for the medium long term. Chart Pattern: 🔹DT - Double Top | BEARISH | 🔴 🔹DB - Double Bottom | BULLISH | 🟢 🔹HNS - Head & Shoulder | BEARISH | 🔴 🔹REC - Rectangle | 🔵 🔹iHNS - inverse head & Shoulder | BULLISH | 🟢 Verify it first and believe later. WavePoint ❤️
AMEX:IWM
by wavepoint99
IWM - Rising Trend Channel [MID-TERM]🔹Breakout resistance 179 in double bottom formation. 🔹Approaches resistance at 198 potential NEGATIVE reaction; upward break POSITIVE. 🔹Technically NEUTRAL for medium long term. Chart Pattern; 🔹DT - Double Top | BEARISH | 🔴 🔹DB - Double Bottom | BULLISH | 🟢 🔹HNS - Head & Shoulder | BEARISH | 🔴 🔹REC - Rectangle | 🔵 🔹iHNS - inverse head & Shoulder | BULLISH | 🟢 Verify it first and believe later. WavePoint ❤️
AMEX:IWM
by wavepoint99
IWM Symmetrical Triangle Hi all, this morning I want to make a post on IWM, one of my personal core holdings. For those who do not already know, IWM tracks the Russell 2000, which is a collection of the top 2000 small-cap US equities. Fundamentally, we are beginning to see default rates jump within smaller companies and poorly equipped balance sheets not being able to handle the pressure. Looking at the sector weightings, I see 16% tech, 16% healthcare, and 15% industrials. These industries rely on debt for a large majority of their growth. Lots of small-cap companies rely on floating-rate debt (interest payments rise with higher rates) due to creditors wanting higher yields for taking on the perceived risk. Also, lots of these 'cheap money notes' are beginning to mature and will continue into 2025. When these companies need to acquire new debt, creditors will either A. require much higher yields than before or B. not provide any debt whatsoever. Yields are a huge driver for growth. Technically, I'm seeing a symmetrical triangle pointing to the downside. As we've completed a 5-wave move, we could see a sharp downturn for IWM.
AMEX:IWMShort
by K_Oneill
Monday Market Update: SPY, QQQ, IWMHey everyone, Posting my Monday market outlook. Targets are as follows: SPY: Bullish Condition: 358.36 Bearish Condition: 456.18 High target (if bullish condition) 464 Low target (if bearish condition) 450 IWM: Bullish Condition: 197.58 Bearish condition: 195.99 High target (if bullish condition) 200 Low target (if bearish condition) 192 For tech, I am looking at 385 to the upside. If that is broken the immediate targets are 389 followed by 391. If we break to the downside, the targets are 378 followed by 375. My thoughts, Safe trades!
AMEX:IWM
by Steversteves
5