Get started

Beyond Technical Analysis

Can the U.S. Dollar Overtake the Euro? Will EUR/USD Fall Below 1The EUR/USD pair has been hovering near a critical psychological level of 1.0000, sparking debates among traders about whether the U.S. dollar's strength could push the euro below parity. Current market dynamics suggest that a break below this level is plausible, with a potential target of 0.9889. Historical Context: Why Did EUR/USD Fall Below 1.00 in September 2022? The last time EUR/USD fell below parity was in September 2022, driven by several key factors: Aggressive Federal Reserve Rate Hikes: The Federal Reserve was highly hawkish in 2022, implementing aggressive rate hikes to combat inflation. This strengthened the U.S. dollar significantly against other currencies, including the euro. Eurozone Energy Crisis: The Eurozone faced an energy crisis due to reduced natural gas supplies following geopolitical tensions with Russia. This created economic uncertainty, weakening the euro. Recession Fears in Europe: Concerns about a potential recession in the Eurozone further pressured the euro, as investors shifted their focus to the relative safety of the U.S. dollar. ------------------------------------ Key Technical Levels: Resistance at 1.0090: The pair is currently facing strong resistance at 1.0090, where sellers have consistently stepped in to cap bullish attempts. This level aligns with a key supply zone, suggesting heavy sell-side liquidity. Support at 1.0000: The psychological level of 1.0000 acts as a critical support zone. A break below this level could lead to accelerated selling pressure. Next Target: 0.9889: If the support at 1.0000 is breached, the pair could decline toward 0.9889, marking the next major support level from the previous price action. ------------------------------------ Factors Driving the Dollar’s Strength Today: U.S. Economic Resilience: ]Strong economic data from the U.S., such as better-than-expected GDP growth and employment numbers, continues to support the dollar’s strength. Federal Reserve’s Hawkish Stance: The Federal Reserve’s commitment to keeping interest rates high to combat inflation has been a major driver of USD appreciation. Eurozone Weakness: On the other hand, weaker economic performance in the Eurozone, coupled with uncertainty around energy markets, has kept the euro under pressure.
Short
by melikatrader94
3
Market Anomaly Detector (MAD) Performance (PAID)The chart showcases the performance of our Market Anomaly Detector (MAD) indicator on the Bitcoin/USDT pair using a 15-minute timeframe. This indicator is designed to identify significant price anomalies, reversals, and trend continuations based on statistical and momentum analysis. Key Features Demonstrated: 1. Anomaly Zones: • The background highlights Bullish (green) and Bearish (red) anomaly zones, where price deviates significantly from expected levels. • Neutral zones (gray) represent expected price ranges, allowing traders to anticipate consolidations or trend reversals. 2. Buy/Sell Signals: • Buy signals (green labels): Appear when conditions confirm a reversal or continuation of a bullish trend. • Sell signals (red labels): Indicate bearish momentum with strong confirmation of a downward trend. 3. Dynamic Price Bands: • The upper and lower bands act as dynamic resistance and support levels, providing early visual cues for potential reversals or breakout zones. 4. Signal Accuracy: • The chart demonstrates how the indicator filters false signals by employing conditions like RSI confirmation, Z-Score thresholds, and volume validation. • Signals appearing on confirmation candles ensure stronger reliability and avoid premature entries.
by TradeTechanalysis
"Buy high, sell low" BTC price expectation in the next 4 years Many of traders probably have came across this phase "buy high, sell low". It's a joke spinning from the correct way of trading - "buy low, sell high". However, it seems that is what I was doing early on my trading. There is another one when I buy and the price seems to always drop, and when I finally sell, the price climb to a new ATH. It is odd that many trader can relate to this. As I got more experienced in trading, I have learned that trading is all about the timing and preparation. My timing was off, therefore I was not prepare. Luckily the macro cycle of BTC and crypto in general is very predictable. This makes the timing easy to be recognized and make the preparation easy. I have experienced 3 of the BTC halving and Alt coin seasons. Every 4 year, BTC halving occurs (google if you dont know, it's very important) and several months later BTC price climb and surpass the ATH. This exact event had occur many times on: 2012, 2016, 2020, and now 2024. After breaking the ATH, the BTC price becomes stagnant, which starts the Alt coin season, then become extremely violetlike, drop and crypto winter begins. This is the pattern that I have recognized and learn so that I can prepare myself to maximize profit. "The past event may not occur again and should not be used to predict the future". This phase haunts me before I finally took the leap of faith. During the crypto winter of 2019 and covid, I had predicted that if the covid panic did not bring BTC down to zero, its going to bounce back up and break its ATH after the halving. Surely enough it did. Unfortunately, I had only bagged a small amount of BTC. Then I sold during the declining of the first pump in the early 2021. The lesson I learn here is that selling is much harder than buying. It is because I held the bag since covid, felt like I was married to them, while worry about if I had sell them at the best value. Even if I had sold on the down trend, I made nearly 8X. Different level of preparation went into this 2024 BTC cycle, I had bought some BTC in 2022, 2023, before and after the FTX went bankrupt. I had DCA through out the crypto winter. This time I was ready. Interesting thing about this cycle was my timing felt.....off, it felt like I was just throwing money into endless pit. Then it finally clicked, this was the buyers' market, and buyers want to buy BTC at the lowest price possible. While, everyone is selling to get rid of the BTC, I will keep on buying. By no means this feel good at all, seeing your investment just decrease over time. Then 1 day, the negative return became positive. It was a moment of euphoria and relief. Lesson learn from the previous time about selling, I set a target for BTC price at 100K, once BTC reach 100K - sell. So I did. I anticipate this cycle ATH will be around 100-110K. Some crazy events will occur again, I dont know what it is but it will.... then BTC price will drop in 2026-2027. Some time between these two years, it is the best time to purchase. I anticipate that the cycle low will be around 20K to 35K. The halving will occur in 2028, then by the end of the year it will pump. I will update when purchase starts, see you in 2026
COINBASE:BTCUSD
by CptGucci
Wajani Investment...Long-term investment in this currencyGBPCAD 12/24/2024 This trade is for those looking to invest in a currency. This is a long-term trade (investment). This pair entered consolidation or has been in accumulation since 2016 (PS) . It created a Spring (SP) sometime in 2022 and finally the l ast point of support (LPS) in 2024 . It has taken approximately nine years of accumulation to reach LPS. For those who are familiar with Wyckoff trading method , this is more understandable. This shit is gonna explode like BTC lol If you are interested in learning more, please reach out. Remember, this is for educational purposes ONLY. Let me know your thoughts. For educational purposes only.
Long
by racyrace
SOLUSDT - Will this nightmare come true?On October 22, I published this chart, and many were skeptical about what I was talking about. "I share it and u can check the link i left in attachment." Now, this scenario is highly likely, and everything is unfolding as shown in the chart below. You can clearly see the Wyckoff Distribution pattern already formed, and so far, price movements align significantly with the illustration provided. Currently, the price has returned to the distribution zone, hitting the "failed rally point" . All of this appears to have been a trap. And why not?... SOL is one of the largest coins in the market by market cap. Everyone is expecting SOL to achieve x3 or even x10. This makes it entirely logical for the price not to move higher amidst this level of optimism. I’m not entirely pessimistic, but I view things from a purely logical perspective. This pattern is not yet confirmed—we need a massive red candle closing below the distribution zone to confirm it. However, the price movement so far is perfectly aligned with the Wyckoff Distribution logic. If a close below this red zone happens, consider it a signal to exit the market entirely."
by ceciliones
18
Are the Bitcoin bulls and bears right?Bitcoin has been the top performing asset in the world and by far the greatest. With bitcoin attempting to be the world’s reserve asset, are the bulls accurate to say that 245K is the Top while the bulls are saying 85K is the Low? Both can be right, and there lies the confusion. Elliott wave enthusiast may say we’re in a fourth wave correction leading to the top of the market. The four wave may actually go as deep as 85k as the bears predict but may also be the wave leading into the top $245k as the bulls predict. Somewhere in between the two lies the answer.
CME:BTC1!Long
by ParabolicP
Decoding the BTC-ES Correlation During FOMC Meetings1. Introduction The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meetings are pivotal events that significantly impact global financial markets. Traders across asset classes closely monitor these meetings for insights into the Federal Reserve’s stance on monetary policy, interest rates, and economic outlook. In this article, we delve into the correlation between Bitcoin futures (BTC) and E-mini S&P 500 futures (ES) during FOMC meetings. Focusing on the window from one day prior to one day after each meeting, our findings reveal that BTC and ES exhibit a positive correlation 63% of the time. This relationship offers valuable insights for traders navigating these volatile periods. 2. The Significance of Correlations in Market Analysis Correlation is a vital tool in market analysis, representing the relationship between two assets. A positive correlation indicates that two assets move in the same direction, while a negative correlation implies they move in opposite directions. BTC and ES are particularly intriguing to study due to their distinct market segments—cryptocurrency and traditional equities. Observing how these two assets interact during FOMC meetings provides a window into macroeconomic forces that affect both markets. The key finding: BTC and ES are positively correlated 63% of the time around FOMC meetings. This suggests that, despite their differences, both markets often react similarly to macroeconomic developments during these critical periods. 3. Methodology and Data Overview To analyze the BTC-ES correlation, we focused on a specific timeframe: one day before to one day after each FOMC meeting. Daily closing prices for both assets were used to calculate correlations, providing a clear view of their relationship during these events. The analysis includes data from multiple FOMC meetings spanning several years. The accompanying charts—such as the correlation heatmap, table of BTC-ES correlations, and line chart—help visualize these findings, highlighting the periods of positive and negative correlation. Contract Specifications: o E-mini S&P 500 Futures (ES): Contract Size: $50 x S&P 500 Index. Minimum Tick: 0.25 points, equivalent to $12.50. Initial Margin Requirement: Approximately $15,500 (subject to change). o Bitcoin Futures (BTC): Contract Size: 5 Bitcoin. Minimum Tick: $5 per Bitcoin, equivalent to $25 per tick. Initial Margin Requirement: Approximately $112,000 (subject to change). These specifications highlight the differences in notional value and margin requirements, underscoring the distinct characteristics of each contract. 4. Findings: BTC and ES Correlations During FOMC Meetings The analysis reveals several noteworthy trends: Positive Correlations (63% of the time): During these periods, BTC and ES tend to move in the same direction, reflecting shared sensitivity to macroeconomic themes such as interest rate adjustments or economic projections. Negative Correlations: These occur sporadically, suggesting that, in certain scenarios, BTC and ES respond differently to FOMC announcements. 5. Interpretation: Why Do BTC and ES Correlate? The observed correlation between Bitcoin futures (BTC) and E-mini S&P 500 futures (ES) around FOMC meetings can be attributed to several factors: Macro Sensitivity: Both BTC and ES are heavily influenced by macroeconomic variables such as interest rate decisions, inflation expectations, and liquidity changes. The FOMC meetings, being central to these narratives, often create synchronized market reactions. Institutional Adoption: The increasing participation of institutional investors in Bitcoin trading aligns its performance more closely with traditional risk assets like equities. This is evident during FOMC events, where institutional sentiment towards risk assets tends to align. Market Liquidity: FOMC meetings often drive liquidity shifts across asset classes. This can lead to aligned movement in BTC and ES as traders adjust their portfolios in response to policy announcements. This correlation provides traders with actionable insights into how these assets might react during future FOMC windows. 6. Forward-Looking Implications Understanding the historical correlation between BTC and ES during FOMC meetings offers a strategic edge for traders: Hedging Opportunities: Traders can use the BTC-ES relationship to construct hedging strategies, such as using one asset to offset potential adverse moves in the other. Volatility Exploitation: Positive correlation periods may signal opportunities for trend-following strategies, while negative correlation phases could favor pairs trading strategies. Risk-On/Risk-Off Cues: The alignment or divergence of BTC and ES can act as a barometer for market-wide sentiment, aiding decision-making in other correlated assets. Future FOMC events could present similar dynamics, and traders can leverage this data to refine their approach. 7. Risk Management Considerations While correlations provide valuable insights, they are not guaranteed to persist. Effective risk management is crucial, particularly during volatile periods like FOMC meetings: Stop-Loss Orders: Ensure every trade is equipped with a stop-loss to cap potential losses. Position Sizing: Adjust position sizes based on volatility and margin requirements for BTC and ES. Diversification: Avoid over-concentration in highly correlated assets to reduce portfolio risk. Monitoring Correlations: Regularly assess whether the BTC-ES correlation holds true during future events, as changing market conditions could alter these relationships. A disciplined approach to risk management enhances the probability of navigating FOMC volatility successfully. 8. Conclusion The correlation between Bitcoin futures (BTC) and E-mini S&P 500 futures (ES) around FOMC meetings highlights the interconnected nature of modern financial markets. With 63% of these events showing positive correlation, traders can glean actionable insights into how these assets react to macroeconomic shifts. While the relationship between BTC and ES may fluctuate, understanding its drivers and implications equips traders with tools to navigate market volatility effectively. By combining historical analysis with proactive risk management, traders can make informed decisions during future FOMC windows. When charting futures, the data provided could be delayed. Traders working with the ticker symbols discussed in this idea may prefer to use CME Group real-time data plan on TradingView: www.tradingview.com - This consideration is particularly important for shorter-term traders, whereas it may be less critical for those focused on longer-term trading strategies. General Disclaimer: The trade ideas presented herein are solely for illustrative purposes forming a part of a case study intended to demonstrate key principles in risk management within the context of the specific market scenarios discussed. These ideas are not to be interpreted as investment recommendations or financial advice. They do not endorse or promote any specific trading strategies, financial products, or services. The information provided is based on data believed to be reliable; however, its accuracy or completeness cannot be guaranteed. Trading in financial markets involves risks, including the potential loss of principal. Each individual should conduct their own research and consult with professional financial advisors before making any investment decisions. The author or publisher of this content bears no responsibility for any actions taken based on the information provided or for any resultant financial or other losses.
CME_MINI:ES1!Education
by traddictiv